The Hechinger Study is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign upwards for our weekly newsletters to become stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

college-tuition discounts

College-tuition discounts are now the rule rather than the exception. And that'southward sent the higher pedagogy establishment into a tailspin.

Consider final month'south annual tuition discounting report from the National Association of Higher and Academy Business Officers. The report showed that colleges now grant some sort of aid to almost ninety percent of freshmen, an best high. (Tuition discounting is a reduction in a college'due south listed price that occurs because colleges provide need-based and merit-based financial aid to promote admission to higher education and maintain enrollment).

The report invites those who turn up their noses at discounting as if it were a blue light special at Kmart to gnash their teeth and barm at the mouth.

Related: Stop saying "higher isn't for everyone"

Predictably, there was panic among those who believe these disbelieve rates are unsustainable. Others were confused virtually what the report meant. And there were plenty who used the report to attack colleges and universities for the high-price/high-disbelieve business organization model.

Higher choices aren't limitless, but they are plentiful and families would be short-sighted non to hunt down their ain terrific deal in higher ed.

What is overlooked in the analysis — though not necessarily the written report itself — is that discounting is simply a measure of how much financial aid is needed to enroll the millions of students who are headed to college this year.

The numbers should exist celebrated past those who advocate for affordability and admission. Consumer behavior is an important consideration and toll and affordability are of paramount importance in the decision-making procedure

Related: How Tuition Tracker helps kids compare colleges – and other tips for overwhelmed parents

It may seem hard to refrain from joining those who protest that college is condign a commodity and that the student at present shops for a degree the aforementioned style that a driver shops for a car. After all who doesn't want anybody to view higher ed as much more than meaningful than automobiles or pork bellies or steel, sought at the lowest price possible? Who doesn't want to sprint away from the idea of students every bit customers? And what administrator doesn't want to have on discounting and the practice of giving away our product at rates that are sometimes lower than our costs to provide it?

Related: Terminate maxim higher isn't for everyone

And yet the dialogue confronting tuition discounting is and so full of Pollyanna-like sentiments that its proponents miss the bespeak that families value higher education, and they also increasingly empathise that they are in the driver's seat when it comes to negotiating what they think is all-time for their children's career aspirations and pocketbook.

College education'southward internal, naïve optimism is fodder for those who are aroused with boards, presidents, administrators and policy makers, who they believe are abandoning mission and take become also sensitive to student and parent expectation and market condition. And data like the tuition discounting report backstops, to families and elected officials, the notion that we are playing games with toll and admission.

Related: Parents making under $30,000 can already send their children to higher for free

If we are honest, we have to acknowledge that higher education and college ed professionals didn't create the idea of college as a commodity and the pupil equally a customer seeking the lowest price; students, parents and the market did. Students and families accept choices — lots of them — and no higher wants to be the passed-upwards pick.

The report on discounting reinforces that decisions about toll, value and affordability are taking on a new importance in this mix and colleges take done what they always done: responded, changed and adjusted. It'due south misguided to call back we are putting this give-and-take to residue by but saying a pupil is not a customer and college is not a commodity and that discounting lonely is unsustainable. At that place is so much more complexity to these conversations than tin can be shared in an essay and they deserve more than discussion across campuses and in the boardroom.

In The Future of Success, onetime Labor Secretarial assistant Robert Reich describes an "historic period of the terrific deal," in which "but the indolent, insane, or congenitally complacent would pass upwardly a production that'south plain better (and costs more than) or cheaper (and of the same quality), an investment with a high return, a more rewarding task, a more comfortable community."

Related: The $150 million question: What does federal regulation really cost colleges?

As an educator and higher education ambassador on the front lines of communicating with prospective students about the value of higher education, I can tell you lot that Reich's comments boom downward the bug we face and his observations should not be ignored.

The electric current state of higher education is cultural, economic and natural. College choices aren't limitless, but they are plentiful and families would be brusque-sighted not to hunt down their own terrific deal in higher ed. After all, students and their families are the ones paying out of pocket for college, and it's in their best involvement to find the establishment that offers the best return on investment. Schools can adapt or willingly place their institutions in peril.

There are still some people who conceptualize a return good one-time days when discount rates were low, students didn't think and bear equally consumers, and higher ed was exempt from economic valuation.

Those people are going to take to wait for a long, long fourth dimension.

Kent Barnds is executive vice president and vice president, enrollment, communication and planning for Augustana College in Rock Island, Illinois.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it'due south gratis to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed well-nigh pressing bug at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Kent Barnds is executive vice president and vice president, enrollment, communication and planning for Augustana Higher in Rock Island, Illinois.